November 4, 2025

Zoom Fatigue Is a Myth. Here Is What Is Actually Draining Your Team.

Research confirms video meetings are not more exhausting than in-person ones. The real culprit behind team exhaustion is something leaders have more control over.

Zoom fatigue. Everyone is blaming video meetings for burning out their teams. It has become one of the central arguments for dragging people back into the office. But here is the reality: zoom fatigue simply is not true. And if you are still using it as your justification for return-to-office mandates, you are fixing the wrong problem.

New research from Johannes Gutenberg University tracked 945 meetings over ten days, with 62% of those meetings conducted online. What they found was clear: video meetings are not more exhausting than face-to-face meetings. In fact, video meetings under 44 minutes are actually less draining than their in-person equivalents.

So where did zoom fatigue come from? The researchers found that all the previous studies showing exhaustion from video calls were conducted during lockdown. What people were really exhausted by was not the technology — it was the pandemic. The isolation. The loss of routine. The anxiety. The absence of normal life. As the lead researcher put it: all the negative aspects associated with lockdown were projected onto zoom meetings, because zoom meetings were so closely linked to that period. We blamed the tool. The tool was not the problem.

What does this mean for managers? Stop assuming remote work equals burnout. It does not. What actually drains people? Long meetings. Anything over 44 minutes. Back-to-back calls with no breaks. And commuting through peak-hour chaos.

Here is a simple fix. Cap your meetings at 40 minutes. If a meeting needs to run longer, build in a break. Apply this rule consistently — whether the meeting is in person or online. The research is clear that it is the length and structure of meetings that drive fatigue, not the format.

Your team will be sharper, less drained and you will get more done. Remote work is not the villain. Bloated meeting culture is. Fix the meetings, not the location.

Related program

Influential Conversations

Support your leaders to be more collaborative and confident in getting buy-in.
View Program
View all Programs

Common Questions

No. Research from Johannes Gutenberg University tracked 945 meetings over ten days, 62% of them online. They found that video meetings are not more exhausting than face-to-face. In fact, meetings under 44 minutes on video are less draining than in-person equivalents. The original Zoom fatigue studies were conducted during lockdown and measured pandemic anxiety, not video call effects.
Long meetings — anything over 44 minutes. Back-to-back calls with no breaks. And, yes, commuting through peak-hour chaos. The research found all three were significant drains. The format (video vs in-person) matters far less than the structure and length of the meeting itself. Meeting culture is the problem, not the technology.
Cap meetings at 40 minutes. If a meeting needs longer, build in a break. Apply this rule to both in-person and video meetings equally — the research shows fatigue is driven by length and back-to-back structure, not format. Shorter, better-structured meetings produce sharper teams. Remote work is not the villain here. Bloated meeting culture is.