August 26, 2025

The Myth of the Ideal Worker — and Why the Model Is Finally Breaking

The ideal worker model — always available, always devoted — is unsustainable and inequitable. Research shows protecting life outside work improves performance, not compromises it.

For decades we have been measuring commitment by hours clocked, not outcomes delivered. The ideal worker was the person who stayed late, answered emails at midnight and put work above everything else. If you could not do that — because you had children, or ageing parents, or just wanted a life — you were seen as less dedicated, less promotable, less valuable.

That model was never sustainable. And it is finally starting to crack.

A colleague introduced me to the concept of drive time. You divide your priorities into three areas: the work tasks you absolutely have to complete; the things that are meaningful to your life outside work — time with family, exercise, hobbies, whatever fills your tank; and a third category he keeps asking you to discover for yourself. The point is this: when you protect what matters outside of work, your work improves — not in spite of it, but because of it.

Research from King's Business School and the University of Zurich analysed job postings across 47 occupations over two decades. They found that the language in job advertisements is shifting. References to work-life balance and family support have increased substantially since 2001. Employers are beginning to signal that it is acceptable — even expected — for workers to have lives beyond their desks.

And here is the important finding: the occupations that clung most tightly to the old model — those still demanding long hours and full devotion — also had wider gender pay gaps and wider part-time pay gaps. Clinging to the ideal worker norm is not just bad for people. It is bad for equity. And it is bad for performance.

As the lead researcher put it: understanding that workers have diverse demands in their lives, and supporting them to meet those demands, is not only good for workers — it is good for productivity and the bottom line.

Stop measuring commitment by hours. Start measuring it by impact. And if you are the one struggling to switch off, define your drive time — the activities outside work that give you genuine relief and recharge you. Build those into your week not as rewards for working hard, but as non-negotiables that make you better at your job.

The ideal worker is not the one who never logs off. It is the one who knows how to show up — rested, focused and ready to deliver.

Related program

RISE Leadership Accelerator

Develop stronger leaders, retain your best people, and lift performance across the whole organisation.
View Program
View all Programs

Common Questions

The ideal worker model measures commitment by hours worked and full devotion to the job. It disadvantages anyone with responsibilities outside work and consistently produces wider gender and part-time pay gaps. Research from King's Business School and the University of Zurich found that occupations with stronger ideal worker norms have measurably worse equity outcomes. The model is not just unsustainable. It is discriminatory.
When people protect what matters outside of work — family time, exercise, recovery — they return to work more focused and better able to do the deep thinking their roles require. The research shows this is not a compromise. It is a performance multiplier. Professor Hae Jung Chung's research found that supporting workers to meet their diverse demands improves productivity and the bottom line.
Impact delivered. When someone asks to leave at 4 p.m. to pick up their children, that is not a compromise on commitment. It is someone who knows how to prioritise and protect what matters. Define your non-negotiables outside work — the things that give you relief, recharge you and make you bring more to your work. Build those in as structural parts of your week, not rewards for working hard.